Tim Reynolds - Message Board
Tim Reynolds - Message Board
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Tim Reynolds Message Board
 Friends Aboard the Space Pod
 Martin or Taylor? for an AcousticElectric

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Antispam question: How many total fingers does a human have?
Answer:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
34AntsMarchinonGreyStreet Posted - 11/27/2002 : 12:05:36 AM
Situation: $1100 or loss, Martin or Taylor, for an acoustic electric.
Discuss....
Thanks to any responses
11   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
LizT Posted - 12/09/2002 : 8:17:56 PM
Taylor

For the same reason as Jason, LOL!
Evergreen Posted - 12/04/2002 : 3:04:47 PM
What did you end up getting?
Silky The Pimp Posted - 12/02/2002 : 6:07:30 PM
They are both great guitar makers... quality is certainly equal on either one-- superb. Just play them both because it really isn't possible to say that one is better than the other. You will likely just find subtle differences that will draw you more towards one or the other.
GuitarGuy305 Posted - 11/27/2002 : 10:25:47 PM
I agree, go to a music store, find a couple Martins and a couple Taylors in your price range, play them, and decide which one you want. Also keep in mind what kind of electronics are in them, if they are acoustic/electric, and definitely plug them in and try them out that way too.


BTW, I prefer Martins, but I have played a few Taylors that were pretty nice sounding....for like 3000 bucks....


Adam
Ccr152 Posted - 11/27/2002 : 12:46:47 PM
quote:
Originally posted by prsmartin

Martin, Martin, Martin, Martin, Martin.
Much better quality, and it'll last you longer. Plus they warm up better in regards to tones.



taylor taylor taylor. much better quality, much fuller tone and my dad has had a taylor for 10 years and it still kicks ass. i think there's a lot more 'mmph' in a taylor. martins are nice, but i think the difference between a martin and a taylor is like the difference between the 50s beatles and the post-50s beatles, respectively. it all depends on what you play and what YOU think sounds better.
Fleabass76 Posted - 11/27/2002 : 12:32:35 PM
I think in the grand spectrum of things, cheaper Martins sound better than cheaper Taylors...but that's just what I've heard from other guitarists...I'm just a bass player...I played a Martin acoustic bass once and I thought it sucked ass. I guess I'll stop being irrelevant now.
enthuTIMsiast Posted - 11/27/2002 : 11:31:59 AM
I say Martin, but just because it's my last name and I think they are cool guitars. I have a friend who really likes his Taylor, however.
prsmartin Posted - 11/27/2002 : 11:23:06 AM
Martin, Martin, Martin, Martin, Martin.
Much better quality, and it'll last you longer. Plus they warm up better in regards to tones.
pcbTIM Posted - 11/27/2002 : 09:16:11 AM
The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire.

Discuss.
enthuTIMsiast Posted - 11/27/2002 : 08:24:28 AM
The Industrial Revolution was neither Industrial nor a Revolution.

Discuss.
enthuTIMsiast Posted - 11/27/2002 : 08:21:27 AM
Duran Duran was neither Duran nor Duran.

Discuss.

Tim Reynolds - Message Board © Back to the top Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000