| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
rubylith
Fluffy-Esque
1915 Posts |
 Posted - 02/06/2007 : 10:36:24 AM
|
No Law To Mandate Dangerous, Untested HPV Vaccine
Media hoax fools parents into thinking Merck shots are mandatory, big pharma laughs as obscene profits roll in
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
A media hoax has fooled parents in Texas and other areas of the country that the HPV vaccine, which experts have slammed as untested and has already been linked to dangerous side-effects, is now the law and young girls must take it. Merck Pharmaceuticals are set to capitalize on this fraud by making obscene profits from a crony deal with Governor Rick Perry, while children are put at risk.
Perry issued an executive order Friday requiring girls to be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted HPV, or human pappilomavirus. Doctors, scientists and experts were not consulted before the sweeping mandate was put in place. Several Texas lawmakers, including Sen. Jane Nelson, have petitioned for a reversal of the decision but the Legislature has no authority to repeal Perry's executive order.
According to the Associated Press, Perry has close ties to Merck, having received money from them for his re-election campaign .
"He also has ties to Women in Government, a Merck-funded advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for the group," reports the AP.
Perry's former chief of staff Mike Toomey is on the Merck payroll as a lobbyist.
Almost immediately following Perry's announcement, newspapers and TV stations began to report that it was "the law" that parents had to have their child vaccinated. This reflects a national and international hoax that is repeatedly being perpetrated shortly before school terms begin each year.
There is no law in America, aside from those applying to medical workers, that says you or your child has to take any vaccine whatsoever, no matter what any executive order, requirement, mandate or policy dictates, there is no situation where you can go to prison for refusing a government vaccine under the U.S. constitution and the law of the land.
As in the case of all other vaccines, Perry's executive order merely states that the vaccine is "recommended," yet the mass media drumbeat constantly conditions people to believe that if they don't take their shots they will be kicked out of school, arrested and thrown in jail. This trick will continue to hoodwink Americans into taking all manner of dangerous and untested vaccines, the number of which rises every year, until they realize that there is no law that forces them to take any vaccine.
This issue is of vital importance not just to Texans but to everyone across the country, because all fifty states have been the target of Merck Pharmaceutical's biggest lobbying effort ever to get this vaccine mandated throughout the nation, by paying off Governors and other officials to curry favor. Merck were unable to sell the "benefits" of the vaccine to make enough profit out of it, so instead they turned to state legislature to force eleven year old girls (and in other states children as young as eight) who aren't even sexually active to take the shot.
A lot of states have rejected Merck's advances outright but Texas could provoke a chain reaction that would influence other areas to submit to big pharma's agenda.
What is actually in the vaccine? Live genetically engineered cancer virus. As the vaccine spreads in use, reports of horrible side effects are already starting to proliferate.
"Negative side effects of Gardasil, a new Merck vaccine to prevent the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, are being reported in the District of Columbia and 20 states, including Virginia. The reactions range from loss of consciousness to seizures," reports the Washington Times.
"Young girls are experiencing severe headaches, dizziness, temporary loss of vision and some girls have lost consciousness during what appear to be seizures," said Vicky Debold, health policy analyst for the National Vaccine Information Center, a nonprofit watchdog organization that was created in the early 1980s to prevent vaccine injuries."
The report quotes physicians who debunk the claim that the HPV vaccine even prevents cervical cancer, as is claimed by Merck and the FDA.
"There is no proof Gardasil will stop cervical cancer," said Clayton Young, an obstetrician/gynecologist in Texas, "They haven't been studying it long enough to make that claim."
Merck makes 360 dollars per shot, equaling billions of dollars in fat profits from bullying or paying off legislatures to mandate the vaccine.
Media spin has succeeded in turning the debate into a partisan issue, putting liberals to sleep, aided by deluded conservatives who are only against the executive order because it seemingly encourages teenagers to have pre-marital sex.
The core of the issue has nothing to with partisan bickering about abstinence, it's about the fundamental human right to not have your body meddled with on the order of a government mandate which isn't even a law. Liberals will whine all day about their right to kill babies in the womb, arguing that the government shouldn't interfere with what a woman chooses to do with her body, but when it comes to mandatory vaccines, they're all for it!
As an example, check out this commentary from the liberal Crooks and Liars website.
"Seriously, this is such a no-brainer that I'm surprised other states haven't jumped on the bandwagon. The whole wingnut argument that this encourages girls to have sex is a bit bizarre to me. As a mom, I truly hope that my daughter will have a fulfilling sex life when she's an adult. I don't see how a shot in the sixth grade will make her more likely to have sex at a younger age. But if I can do something to prevent her from getting cancer in her 40s, what's the problem with that?"
The problem is that men in black uniforms holding your child down and sticking a needle in their arm by executive order whether you like it or not is un-American. Liberals will cry Roe vs. Wade all day long when it comes to aborting babies but when it comes to the "choice" of letting the government inject their child with whatever they like by force, the pro-choicers are eager to comply.
Vaccines and drugs that are not stringently tested and are instead foisted upon populations for the purposes of making obscene profits have a clear history of deadly consequences.
Consider the case of Bayer Pharmaceuticals, who deliberately dumped a vaccine that was known to be contaminated with AIDS virus on the European and Latin American market after it killed people in America. Thousands died from an action that the U.S. government allowed to happen through the FDA.
Peruse the plethora of examples where vaccines containing mercury, live HIV virus, live cancer and other horrors have wrought misery after victims were bullied into taking them by government mandates that they were deluded into thinking was the law.
The history alone, a legacy that led former director of the National Institute of Health Dr. James R. Shannon to state, "The only safe vaccine is one that is never used," implores us to stand up and fight Perry's collusion with Merck and ensure that similar executive orders are not passed elsewhere in the country as a result of cynical greed driven lobbying and corporate crony payoffs.
Parents across the country should rally to denounce this development, which sets the pretext for the state to dictate the health of their children, as well as moving us closer to legislation which would allow Americans to be forcibly vaccinated at gunpoint against their will during a time of manufactured crisis, such as in the case of a human to human bird flu pandemic.
|
|
|
Hopeful Rolling Waves
Alien Abductee
South Sandwich Islands
2154 Posts |
|
|
therippa
Fluffy-Esque
Kazakhstan
1099 Posts |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 12:14:07 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Hopeful Rolling Waves
Doesn't HPV not even do anything? Fucking Big Pharm.
HPV is what causes genital warts and can cause cervical cancer in women. |
Aspiring to Be Fluffy-Esque an Alien Abductee! |
 |
|
|
Hopeful Rolling Waves
Alien Abductee
South Sandwich Islands
2154 Posts |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 12:50:26 PM
|
| Either way, it's another way for drug companies to fuck up people's lives under the auspices of 'possible treatment' to make quick millions. You don't want VDs? Don't be a slutbag. |
http://db.etree.org/hopefulrollingwaves/ < My Trading List |
|
|
|
Robin
Yak Addict
USA
598 Posts |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 12:55:13 PM
|
| I saw this on the news lastnight and was disgusted. I would never allow the government to force my child or myself to vaccinate. I'm glad to see the article point out the illegality of this. Most people don't know they can refuse to vaccinate. I did and it wasn't a problem at all. Don't let the states decide what gets put into you oryour kid's body!! Peace, Robin |
|
|
|
rubylith
Fluffy-Esque
1915 Posts |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 1:17:16 PM
|
| Right on! |
|
|
|
dan p.
Alien Abductee
Uganda
3776 Posts |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 4:41:44 PM
|
i agree with everything said. that being said, i have something i'd like to add.
i understand that prisonplanet has a readership that demands conspiracy theory. i understand that they're writing to a certain audience, and that this type of writing reaches them best. but if the staff at prisonplanet wants to be taken seriously and really get this news out there, it would probably be in their best interest to exhibit some sort of professionalism. whether you like prisonplanet or not, you have to admit that as far as journalism goes, it's amature hour there. clean up the language and tone of this article, and for fuck's sake, attribute facts. a great rule to follow is this: if you write a fact in your article, attribute it. otherwise, no one knows where it came from. go through every sentence and ask "says who?" let me show you:
"Perry's former chief of staff Mike Toomey is on the Merck payroll as a lobbyist." says who? where's the source? the guys who wrote the article? in real journalism, the person or people who write the article are not an acceptable source. attribute your source. if you can't, don't put it in.
ditto that for paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 16, and 23. and it's not as if they never do it. they do it sometimes, but not others. that makes me suspicious as a reader. i'm not even going to go into the capitalization issues and paragraph division in the article. |
death to false metal. |
|
|
|
dan p.
Alien Abductee
Uganda
3776 Posts |
Posted - 02/06/2007 : 9:46:25 PM
|
| although the article doesn't do this, i'd like to bring it up anyway: i completely disregard people who use the word media as a singlular noun. listen for people who say "the media is" and "the media isn't." chances are they don't really know what they're talking about. media are, or media are not. if you mean news sources, say that instead. these is not my only criterions, though. |
death to false metal. |
|
|
|
Hopeful Rolling Waves
Alien Abductee
South Sandwich Islands
2154 Posts |
Posted - 02/07/2007 : 11:43:08 AM
|
| I agree with you Dan, there is a fine line between a journalist who reads between the line, and a journalist who writes in-between them...be specific, it'll keep you from sounding like you're a nutter. |
http://db.etree.org/hopefulrollingwaves/ < My Trading List |
|
|
|
Arthen
Alien Abductee
USA
4845 Posts |
Posted - 02/07/2007 : 1:31:30 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by dan p.
i agree with everything said. that being said, i have something i'd like to add.
i understand that prisonplanet has a readership that demands conspiracy theory. i understand that they're writing to a certain audience, and that this type of writing reaches them best. but if the staff at prisonplanet wants to be taken seriously and really get this news out there, it would probably be in their best interest to exhibit some sort of professionalism. whether you like prisonplanet or not, you have to admit that as far as journalism goes, it's amature hour there. clean up the language and tone of this article, and for fuck's sake, attribute facts. a great rule to follow is this: if you write a fact in your article, attribute it. otherwise, no one knows where it came from. go through every sentence and ask "says who?" let me show you:
"Perry's former chief of staff Mike Toomey is on the Merck payroll as a lobbyist." says who? where's the source? the guys who wrote the article? in real journalism, the person or people who write the article are not an acceptable source. attribute your source. if you can't, don't put it in.
ditto that for paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 16, and 23. and it's not as if they never do it. they do it sometimes, but not others. that makes me suspicious as a reader. i'm not even going to go into the capitalization issues and paragraph division in the article.
Amen. Abuses of fact and logic fall on both sides of the spectrum, left and right, and they are unacceptable on both counts. |
Steve Hackett: "I'm my own opening act, you see."
Tim (before "Faceoff"): "Peace, love....and SEX!"
cbenc41@hotmail.com |
|
|
|
gnome44
Yak Addict
749 Posts |
Posted - 02/07/2007 : 1:50:55 PM
|
quote:
although the article doesn't do this, i'd like to bring it up anyway: i completely disregard people who use the word media as a singlular noun. listen for people who say "the media is" and "the media isn't." chances are they don't really know what they're talking about. media are, or media are not. if you mean news sources, say that instead. these is not my only criterions, though.
I think that usually when people say "the media is" they really mean "the Media is". In other words it's generally accepted that when referring to "The Media" you're referring to news sources (or generally forms of mass communication...not just "news sources").
Kind of like when texts use "Man" to refer to mankind...
Although I agree with you insofar as completely disregarding people... |
|
|
|
dan p.
Alien Abductee
Uganda
3776 Posts |
Posted - 02/07/2007 : 4:40:36 PM
|
i disagree. the understanding of media, specifically mass media, is something that requires some studying. and i'd have to assume that if a person really knows what they're talking about when they talk about "the media" they've studied it at least enough to know what the word really means and what the word is. they'd know the word is the plural for medium, and they'd understand that news media is a only part of media as a whole, and that each part has different effects on culture and politics. so when someone tells me "the media is," i don't really hear in the same sense i here "man" as "mankind." what it tells me is either
a) they haven't really studied it enough to even know what the word itself means, or b)they're parroting what they've heard someone else say. and either way, i don't want to hear it. here's an example: when tim reynolds says "the media's a weapon of mass destruction," he's wrong. it might be that media are weapons of mass destruction, but it's hard to take seriously. now, tim reynolds is, by all accounts, a learned and well read person. i won't argue that, because it's true. but i still can't really accept things he says about that, because he sounds like people who don't really know what they're talking about when he says it.
and as a side note, words man and mankind are different from media and news media in how they're related. "kind" in mankind is a suffix. you couldn't call elves "mankind." you'd have to call them "elvenkind." no such relation exists between media and new media. media includes, among other things, news media. however, mankind just includes man (meaning humans.) that's why, in context man works, but media does not. i'm not a huge fan of the word mankind, though. humankind is more accurate.
and yeah, it's generally accepted that media means news media, but all that means is that a ton of people are using it incorrectly. i resist definition change through common usage, because a lot of people are really fucking stupid. are we to adopt all the standards of the lowest common denomiator? common usage will put english on par with the aim instant messaging client. words have meanings for a reason. |
death to false metal. |
|
|
|
gnome44
Yak Addict
749 Posts |
Posted - 02/07/2007 : 5:21:07 PM
|
OK...so what I got out of that is that everyone should start using "mediakind". Right?  |
|
|
|
dan p.
Alien Abductee
Uganda
3776 Posts |
Posted - 02/07/2007 : 7:20:10 PM
|
| hahaha. you know something? if that were introduced to the public lexicon, i wouldn't mind. although technically it would have to be "mediumkind," since i the singular form of man is used for mankind. |
death to false metal. |
|
|
|
gnome44
Yak Addict
749 Posts |
Posted - 02/07/2007 : 7:25:29 PM
|
| You know, I thought I was being clever and witty, and then you have to throw it my face with your grammatical correctness. Mediumkind. Eat it! |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
|
|
No Law To Mandate Dangerous, Untested HPV Vaccine
