| Author |
 Topic  |
|
peewee_zz
Chatterbox
157 Posts |
 Posted - 06/29/2006 : 11:25:19 PM
|
I DIDN'T WRITE IT YOU FLIPPING IDIOTS
If you'd even read the first few sentances you'll see that.
I found that on the internet and posted it here. It doesn't matter that I haven't seen them because the original author has.
How can you possibly trust the opinions of people that won't even read my statements before ridiculing them.
Anyway the world is better off ignoring "come to grips with reality" rubylith. The post about Bush recently using "Statements" was argued as being a dictatorship. I read the article. The statements have DIRECTLY to do with national security. As the commander and cheif he has the every right to decide on issues of national security. It says that in the article. I mean rubylith didn't even read it obviously and yet makes his blind blanket statements with no facts to back them up.
This is his whole. Blanket statements and generalizations. He offers no more and researches based on no more. "obviously peewee wrote that. I'm not reading that!"
Get over it you closed minded fools. I mean do you have any idea how narrow minded and shallow you guys are. Any alternative to your thinking, even Dan P. who generally has a good head on his shoulders, gets shut down without any kind of consideration, review or research. You guys are the ones practicing dictatorship on thought. Especially with the "brainwashed" crap that ruby keeps pulling.
Anyway learn to read something before making an ass out of yourselves. hahahaha
I hope someone else calls you out on that. Shutting an article down without reading it. TWICE! |
"That's your true fan base. Everybody else will love you and leave you like an epileptic at a laser light show." -- Me |
 |
|
|
rubylith
Fluffy-Esque
1915 Posts |
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 08:20:26 AM
|
Umm I think we figured it wouldn't be worth reading because of this perticular statement:
quote:
Anyway here's an unoriginal thourough debunking of the entire "loose change" theory and others. I've not watched the video's and still don't plan to. This is also going to be unformated and hard to read. Anyway have at it. See you in a few months when they finally convince Kim Jong Il to hold a 9/11 investigation
Not to mention the post goes on and on, why not in your own reasearch and words you put together something that may show that the World Trade Center WASN'T brought down by internal explosives and thermite. Heck, you may even win the $1,000,000 reward to anyone that CAN prove it.
PeeWee, try and focus on ONE thing here, lets say Building 7, how did the building collapse? Try researching it on your own, instead of getting a cut and paste from some right wing war lover like Hannity.
Their really was never an official explanation, and the 9/11 Commission head Thomas Kean has business ties to the Bin Laden family...now don't you think those 2 THINGS ALONE should merit a new independent investigation?
You can play the role of apologist and call me names, but it only gives credit to my cause. There is no stopping the 9/11 truth movement. You think this STARTED with 9/11??? Go onto google or wikipedia and search for:
Operation AJAX
Reichstag fire and Hitler's rise to power
Gulf of Tonkin
USS Liberty
Operation Gladio
Those were all "false flag" attacks, designed to look as if they were carried out by other groups.
I mean you can believe 19 highjackers from a cave in Afghanistan (oh I mean Saudi Arabia but we'll just ignore that, and bomb the hell out of Afghanistan, since the order was on Bush's desk in August 2001 to invade.) took over 4 planes with box cutters and plastic knives and crashed them into 75% of their targets AND within 45 minutes had 2 of the 2nd largest steel buildings in the world AND a building that wasn't even HIT BY A PLANE, Building 7 (which housed the FBI, CIA, DoD) collapse at the speed of gravity for the first time in history...but if you do believe that, then YOU my friend are the conspiracy goon.
It blows my mind that like 15% of Americans still believe the official fable. |
|
|
|
dan p.
Alien Abductee
Uganda
3776 Posts |
Posted - 06/30/2006 : 09:00:22 AM
|
i would suggest, peewee, that if you haven't seen the video, you're not really qualified to have an opinion on it one way or the other. that you didn't write that post, but rather copy and pasted someone else's work as an argument against the video you haven't seen, indicates that you do, in fact, have an opinion on that vidoe. my statement and underlying logic, which says your opinion on the video does not matter and that you're not really entitled to an opinion on it because you didn't watch it, holds true still. now, the article itself, taken without condsideration as to how it got here, is a valid argument against rubylith. my argument isn't against the article. it's against you for arguing over something you've never even seen. you can't possibly understand what you posted fully if you've not seen the video that the article addresses. it's the same reason why i think reading movie reviews is stupid.
you also seem to be under the impression that i believe the theories which rubylith put forth. i don't. i'm not convinced yet. but i do concede a valid arugment when i see it. the difference, i think, is i read the things he posts and i think "yeah that's a good point. what's up with that?" he reads them and thinks "yeah, that's a good point." and then immediately comes to a conclusion. you just steadfastly refuse to hear any of it.
i don't understand where this idea that everyone is entitled to an opinion on everything comes from. it's a silly idea. if a person don't know anything about it, or doesn't fully understand the opposing sides argument, then that person just isn't entitled to an opinion on it. their opinion doesn't mean anything. there's tons of shit i don't have opinions on because i'm ignorant of the topic. i also don't like the idea that everyone's opinion is equal. nope. who's opinion on plumbing is more valid? mine or a plumbers? the answer is a plumber. |
death to false metal. |
|
|
|
rubylith
Fluffy-Esque
1915 Posts |
Posted - 07/28/2006 : 2:33:53 PM
|
C-Span Airing Of L.A. Conference Shows Mainstreaming Of 9/11 Truth
Fresh injection of credibility advances movement
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | July 28 2006
A decision that many of us were waiting on with baited breath - C-Span's scheduling of the American Scholars Symposium highlights - infuses the 9/11 truth movement with a fresh injection of credibility and exposure to more mainstream audiences.
The panel features incredible presentations by 9/11 Scholars for Truth founder James Fetzer, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones, President of the Institute for Space and Security Studies Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret., Filmmaker and Radio Broadcaster Alex Jones, and Terrorism Expert Webster Tarpley.
C-Span viewers will witness what many consider to be the most hard hitting conference to date including the most professional and credible speakers ever assembled.
Many have expressed a degree of frustration that some quarters of the 9/11 truth movement are not as bold in their stance when drawing conclusions about 9/11 evidence as is necessary to make an impact. The American Scholars Symposium was crystal clear in its summation that 9/11 represents an inside job carried out by criminal elements within the US government. The deliberate implosion of the twin towers and Building 7 allied with the reversal of routine air defense procedures leave no other explanation than the fact that the attack was a self-inflicted wound.
Preaching to the choir is a method best left in the past and the C-Span airing is a positive step towards reaching out and educating those who remain in the dark about the staggering volume of evidence which clearly indicates that the official story behind 9/11 is a fraud.
The distinction, background and high esteem of the speakers at the conference, coupled with C-Span's notable reputation as a bellwether of the mainstream body politic, provides for a perfect symbiosis to advance the credibility and critical acclaim of the 9/11 truth movement as something far weightier and more influential than a cadre of conspiracy theorists - a label still peddled by fading elements of the blowhard establishment press.
It is crucial that everyone see this historic panel discussion on C-SPAN. Tell your friends and family, email colleagues, and post links on message boards. This is an incredible step in spreading the word about the truth about 9/11. It is vital that you focus your educational efforts solely on those who are still unaware of cover-up pertaining to 9/11.
The program will air on C-SPAN 1 at 8PM EST (7PM CST) on Saturday, July 29th and then air again for the West Coast at 11pm EST (10pm CST). You can watch the program online at the times stated above by clicking here.
9/11 Symposium: Professor Steven Jones
Professor Steven Jones gives an illustrated keynote speech about the role of incendiary devices used in the destruction of the twin towers and Building 7. Jones has often been cited as the torch carrier for a newly defined 9/11 movement characterized by science, common sense and credibility.
9/11 Symposium: Lt. Col. Bob Bowman
In this presentation Bowman discusses the ignorance surrounding the events of 9/11 and its aftermath and details the NORAD cover-up surrounding intercept procedures that were not properly executed on that day - drawing from his own experience as an Air Force pilot and his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Cal-Tech.
9/11 Symposium: Professor Jim Fetzer
Fetzer details the implausible collapse of the twin towers according to the melting point of steel in comparison with the temperature of jet fuel. This 78-minute high quality presentation also covers the controversy at the Pentagon in depth with slides to accompany the discussion.
William Rodriguez: 9/11 Hero
Rodriguez passionately engages the audience and discusses the relentless media circus that followed him in the days after 9/11 and his eyewitness accounts of explosions in the underground basement levels of the towers.
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
The Dam is Breaking in the 9/11 Cover-Up
