| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| rubylith |
Posted - 01/09/2008 : 1:42:28 PM
New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.
"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.
The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.
Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.
Read it here with links...
|
| 11 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| pants_happy |
Posted - 01/13/2008 : 6:40:39 PM
quote:
don't get your panties in a twist. it was a joke. it was basically a jab at the free market thunderdome ron paul wants to create.
also, "i wouldn't make baseless claims, because that's not the kind of person i am." and. . .what? that makes you better than me in any way? give me a break.
i don't think i'm better than you, but as most people do when they see something offensive, i get pissed off. the reason i found that offensive, if you really want to know, is because that statement was pretty damn close to what the mainstream media, who are supposed to be unbiased, have been drilling into our heads for the past year! they never have proof to back it up, and ron paul beating ghouliani in iowa and thompson in nh (who are considered 2 of the front runners), while not even focusing on either state but instead waiting till super tuesday (or beyond) to spend his 20mil, is proof that that sentiment is false. paul has consistently said that he's in this for the long run, and he didn't spend 5-10 mil in NH like others because the number of delegates in NH was small to start off with, but it was then cut in half because they moved their primary up. he has to win over 1000 delegates, and NH only had 12. not a good place to spend a lot of your money if you're in it for the long haul.
no dan, if you want to know what i really think of you, it's that you have an excellent grasp on sarcasm and humor (sometimes a little too carried away with sarcasm, most of the time it's funny as hell), and you tell and retell stories really well, such as the frankenstein and eb games ones. that's not ass kissing, that's my honest opinion if you really wanted to know. |
| Arthen |
Posted - 01/13/2008 : 2:03:43 PM
Break me off a piece of that...Chrysler Car...
Break me off a piece of that...football cream...
|
| dan p. |
Posted - 01/13/2008 : 1:16:35 PM
quote:
Originally posted by pants_happy
quote:
Originally posted by dan p.
the free market has determined that nobody likes ron paul.
wow. you just have an absolute seething hatred for ron paul, one that goes beyond logic or reasoning. now let me get this straight: less than .5% of the total votes and delegates have been chosen, and that .5% is somehow representative of the other 99.5%? do you know what outliers are? paul stomped ghouliani in iowa, and thompson in nh. does that mean those two 'major' candidates are out of the race now that they lost to a 'lesser' candidate? maybe ron paul won't get elected, maybe he will. but saying nobody likes ron paul as a blanket statement, even if it was meant as pure sarcasm, is about as ignorant as you can get.
let me ask you dan, just who are you voting for, so i can make baseless claims to be on an even footing with you? oh wait, i wouldn't make baseless claims, because that's not the kind of person i am.
don't get your panties in a twist. it was a joke. it was basically a jab at the free market thunderdome ron paul wants to create.
also, "i wouldn't make baseless claims, because that's not the kind of person i am." and. . .what? that makes you better than me in any way? give me a break. |
| Hopeful Rolling Waves |
Posted - 01/13/2008 : 10:55:58 AM
Again, Nick. Politics equals charged debate.
Allow it to run its course. |
| Ranting Thespian |
Posted - 01/13/2008 : 01:04:28 AM
Hey now, let's calm down and not start picking fights here. |
| pants_happy |
Posted - 01/12/2008 : 9:50:58 PM
quote:
Originally posted by dan p.
the free market has determined that nobody likes ron paul.
wow. you just have an absolute seething hatred for ron paul, one that goes beyond logic or reasoning. now let me get this straight: less than .5% of the total votes and delegates have been chosen, and that .5% is somehow representative of the other 99.5%? do you know what outliers are? paul stomped ghouliani in iowa, and thompson in nh. does that mean those two 'major' candidates are out of the race now that they lost to a 'lesser' candidate? maybe ron paul won't get elected, maybe he will. but saying nobody likes ron paul as a blanket statement, even if it was meant as pure sarcasm, is about as ignorant as you can get.
let me ask you dan, just who are you voting for, so i can make baseless claims to be on an even footing with you? oh wait, i wouldn't make baseless claims, because that's not the kind of person i am. |
| dan p. |
Posted - 01/12/2008 : 12:24:03 PM
the free market has determined that nobody likes ron paul. |
| rubylith |
Posted - 01/11/2008 : 09:32:55 AM
Kucinich Backs New Hampshire Recount
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris warns he could be walking into a trap
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, January 11, 2008
Citing "serious and credible reports, allegations and rumors" about the integrity of Tuesday's results, Congressman Dennis Kucinich is backing a full recount of ballots for the Democratic contest in New Hampshire, meaning that both party's primaries may now both be cast into doubt. However, vote fraud expert Bev Harris has warned that it could all be a trap to validate Diebold electronic voting machines.
As we reported yesterday, New Hampshire Republican candidate Albert Howard is prepared to put his name behind a primary recount in order to ascertain if the example of "human error" in the town of Sutton, where Ron Paul was originally given zero votes, was an isolated case or if wider vote fraud took place.
Kucinich's motivation for demanding a recount is the highly suspicious way in which Hillary Clinton reversed a 13 point pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama, aided by a 7% swing thanks to the use of Diebold electronic voting machines.
"Kucinich alluded to online reports alleging disparities around the state between hand-counted ballots, which tended to favor Sen. Barack Obama, and machine-counted ones that tended to favor Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. He also noted the difference between pre-election polls, which indicated Obama would win, and Clinton's triumph by a 39 percent to 37 percent margin," reports the Associated Press.
No doubt the Congressman is referring to this website, the Brad Blog and others who led the charge in exposing probable vote fraud in the hours after the primary.
Though Kucinich has cautioned that he doesn't expect the recount to produce significantly different results, vote fraud expert Bev Harris warns that unless chain of custody issues are addressed before a recount, the recount itself is worthless because it will be overseen by the same people who committed vote fraud in the first place if indeed there was any chicanery.
In addition, should the recount produce exactly the same results it will validate Diebold electronic voting machines despite the fact that they have been proven to be wide open to fraud.
"A candidate asking for a recount may well be a tool used to 'prove' everything was okay and then that candidate will be further discredited," reports Harris.
"We need citizen control and oversight. This is not going to come from the recount. If the election was rigged...don't you think the riggers would have a backup Plan B for a rigged recount, knowing how easy it is to get a recount in NH?," she concludes.
|
| Zachmozach |
Posted - 01/09/2008 : 7:55:28 PM
Say goodbye to the republic, cause this is a sure sign that our constitutional government is no more. Of course there was plenty of fraud in the last two elections and it has been going on for years in reality, but it's getting worse it seems. |
| Ranting Thespian |
Posted - 01/09/2008 : 7:41:23 PM
This just plain sucks! I want them recounted, and I don't even vote in the primaries! |
| pants_happy |
Posted - 01/09/2008 : 6:15:38 PM
i've been following this since last night, and let me tell you, it goes far beyond sutton. there are voting anomolies across NH.
quote:
John Silvestro and his small private business, LHS Associates, has the exclusive programming contracts for all New Hampshire voting machines, which combined will count about 81 percent of the vote...
taken from blackboxvoting.org , a nonpartisan, nonprofit voting site dedicated to keeping elections honest. there is a LOT more info on Silvestro and his business on there. check it out on their site. one thing you should also know about LHS associates is that one of their main programmers is a convicted drug trafficer and has past complaints of voter fraud!!!
testimony from a programmer asked to rig an election (a must watch!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs
on Silvestro:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs
quote:
Wow. Who is this "other"?
New Hampshire Townships with more then 50 votes for OTHER
By IG | January 9, 2008
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=760#more-760
Barrington - 1,530 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 149 votes = 9.74%
- Huckabee = 208 votes = 13.59%
- Hunter = 11 votes = 0.72%
- McCain = 576 votes = 37.65%
- Paul = 130 votes = 8.50%
- Romney = 363 votes = 23.73%
- Thompson = 28 votes = 1.83%
- Other = 65 votes = 4.25%
Bedford - 6,048 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 579 votes = 9.57%
- Huckabee = 434 votes = 7.18%
- Hunter = 16 votes = 0.26%
- McCain = 2148 votes = 35.52%
- Paul = 263 votes = 4.35%
- Romney = 2479 votes = 40.99%
- Thompson = 51 votes = 0.84%
- Other = 78 votes = 1.29%
Belmont - 1,261 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 96 votes = 7.61%
- Huckabee = 180 votes = 14.27%
- Hunter = 11 votes = 0.87%
- McCain = 456 votes = 36.16%
- Paul = 102 votes = 8.09%
- Romney = 329 votes = 26.09%
- Thompson = 30 votes = 2.38%
- Other = 57 votes = 4.52%
Claremont - 1,631 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Giuliani = 113 votes = 6.93%
- Huckabee = 309 votes = 18.95%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.43%
- McCain = 593 votes = 36.36%
- Paul = 120 votes = 7.36%
- Romney = 398 votes = 24.40%
- Thompson = 22 votes = 1.35%
- Other = 69 votes = 4.23%
Concord - 6,439 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 565 votes = 8.77%
- Huckabee = 781 votes = 12.13%
- Hunter = 24 votes = 0.37%
- McCain = 2684 votes = 41.68%
- Paul = 601 votes = 9.33%
- Romney = 1577 votes = 24.49%
- Thompson = 49 votes = 0.76%
- Other = 158 votes = 2.45%
Dover - 4,268 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 388 votes = 9.09%
- Huckabee = 458 votes = 10.73%
- Hunter = 16 votes = 0.37%
- McCain = 1779 votes = 41.68%
- Paul = 369 votes = 8.65%
- Romney = 1102 votes = 25.82%
- Thompson = 59 votes = 1.38%
- Other = 97 votes = 2.27%
-
Gilford - 1,922 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 139 votes = 7.23%
- Huckabee = 139 votes = 7.23%
- Hunter = 8 votes = 0.42%
- McCain = 740 votes = 38.50%
- Paul = 78 votes = 4.06%
- Romney = 735 votes = 38.24%
- Thompson = 21 votes = 1.09%
- Other = 62 votes = 3.23%
-
Goffstown - 3,561 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 308 votes = 8.65%
- Huckabee = 417 votes = 11.71%
- Hunter = 19 votes = 0.53%
- McCain = 1212 votes = 34.04%
- Paul = 260 votes = 7.30%
- Romney = 1258 votes = 35.33%
- Thompson = 30 votes = 0.84%
- Other = 57 votes = 1.60%
-
Hooksett - 2,862 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 309 votes = 10.80%
- Huckabee = 295 votes = 10.31%
- Hunter = 14 votes = 0.49%
- McCain = 994 votes = 34.73%
- Paul = 169 votes = 5.90%
- Romney = 991 votes = 34.63%
- Thompson = 29 votes = 1.01%
- Other = 61 votes = 2.13%
Hopkinton - 1,491 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 103 votes = 6.91%
- Huckabee = 140 votes = 9.39%
- Hunter = 10 votes = 0.67%
- McCain = 616 votes = 41.31%
- Paul = 80 votes = 5.37%
- Romney = 365 votes = 24.48%
- Thompson = 17 votes = 1.14%
- Other = 160 votes = 10.73%
Hudson - 4,160 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 326 votes = 7.84%
- Huckabee = 454 votes = 10.91%
- Hunter = 21 votes = 0.50%
- McCain = 1395 votes = 33.53%
- Paul = 307 votes = 7.38%
- Romney = 1518 votes = 36.49%
- Thompson = 57 votes = 1.37%
- Other = 82 votes = 1.97%
-
Keene - 2,807 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 218 votes = 7.77%
- Huckabee = 374 votes = 13.32%
- Hunter = 19 votes = 0.68%
- McCain = 1089 votes = 38.80%
- Paul = 204 votes = 7.27%
- Romney = 738 votes = 26.29%
- Thompson = 48 votes = 1.71%
- Other = 117 votes = 4.17%
Lebanon - 1,681 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 122 votes = 7.26%
- Huckabee = 212 votes = 12.61%
- Hunter = 6 votes = 0.36%
- McCain = 726 votes = 43.19%
- Paul = 137 votes = 8.15%
- Romney = 391 votes = 23.26%
- Thompson = 34 votes = 2.02%
- Other = 53 votes = 3.15%
Lisbon - 340 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Giuliani = 28 votes = 8.24%
- Huckabee = 59 votes = 17.35%
- Hunter = 1 votes = 0.29%
- McCain = 106 votes = 31.18%
- Paul = 19 votes = 5.59%
- Romney = 47 votes = 13.82%
- Thompson = 3 votes = 0.88%
- Other = 77 votes = 22.65%
Londonderry - 5,685 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 418 votes = 7.35%
- Huckabee = 544 votes = 9.57%
- Hunter = 19 votes = 0.33%
- McCain = 1757 votes = 30.91%
- Paul = 288 votes = 5.07%
- Romney = 1989 votes = 34.99%
- Thompson = 52 votes = 0.91%
- Other = 618 votes = 10.87% (WTF???)
Manchester - 15,067 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD:
- Giuliani = 1454 votes = 9.65%
- Huckabee = 1640 votes = 10.88%
- Hunter = 94 votes = 0.62%
- McCain = 5119 votes = 33.97%
- Paul = 1230 votes = 8.16%
- Romney = 4935 votes = 32.75%
- Thompson = 139 votes = 0.92%
- Other = 456 votes = 3.03%
Merrimack - 5,806 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 524 votes = 9.03%
- Huckabee = 561 votes = 9.66%
- Hunter = 41 votes = 0.71%
- McCain = 2046 votes = 35.24%
- Paul = 385 votes = 6.63%
- Romney = 2075 votes = 35.74%
- Thompson = 71 votes = 1.22%
- Other = 103 votes = 1.77%
Nashua - 12,195 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 992 votes = 8.13%
- Huckabee = 1120 votes = 9.18%
- Hunter = 62 votes = 0.51%
- McCain = 4294 votes = 35.21%
- Paul = 979 votes = 8.03%
- Romney = 4447 votes = 36.47%
- Thompson = 128 votes = 1.05%
- Other = 173 votes = 1.42%
-
Plaistow - 1,516 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 124 votes = 8.18%
- Huckabee = 97 votes = 6.40%
- Hunter = 4 votes = 0.26%
- McCain = 482 votes = 31.79%
- Paul = 99 votes = 6.53%
- Romney = 641 votes = 42.28%
- Thompson = 15 votes = 0.99%
- Other = 54 votes = 3.56%
Portsmouth - 2,827 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 325 votes = 11.50%
- Huckabee = 196 votes = 6.93%
- Hunter = 10 votes = 0.35%
- McCain = 1219 votes = 43.12%
- Paul = 221 votes = 7.82%
- Romney = 728 votes = 25.75%
- Thompson = 26 votes = 0.92%
- Other = 102 votes = 3.61%
-
Raymond - 1,829 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 160 votes = 8.75%
- Huckabee = 241 votes = 13.18%
- Hunter = 10 votes = 0.55%
- McCain = 618 votes = 33.79%
- Paul = 165 votes = 9.02%
- Romney = 527 votes = 28.81%
- Thompson = 18 votes = 0.98%
- Other = 90 votes = 4.92%
Rochester - 4,339 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 379 votes = 8.73%
- Huckabee = 712 votes = 16.41%
- Hunter = 31 votes = 0.71%
- McCain = 1498 votes = 34.52%
- Paul = 348 votes = 8.02%
- Romney = 1123 votes = 25.88%
- Thompson = 87 votes = 2.01%
- Other = 161 votes = 3.71%
-
Salem - 5,020 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 416 votes = 8.29%
- Huckabee = 402 votes = 8.01%
- Hunter = 17 votes = 0.34%
- McCain = 1566 votes = 31.20%
- Paul = 270 votes = 5.38%
- Romney = 2245 votes = 44.72%
- Thompson = 34 votes = 0.68%
- Other = 70 votes = 1.39%
-
Swanzey - 1,062 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 88 votes = 8.29%
- Huckabee = 145 votes = 13.65%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.66%
- McCain = 413 votes = 38.89%
- Paul = 69 votes = 6.50%
- Romney = 248 votes = 23.35%
- Thompson = 17 votes = 1.60%
- Other = 75 votes = 7.06%
-
Windham - 3,367 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Giuliani = 266 votes = 7.90%
- Huckabee = 233 votes = 6.92%
- Hunter = 8 votes = 0.24%
- McCain = 1065 votes = 31.63%
- Paul = 148 votes = 4.40%
- Romney = 1514 votes = 44.97%
- Thompson = 28 votes = 0.83%
- Other = 105 votes = 3.12%
quote:
N.H. Republican Primary Results
Candidate Votes %
John McCain 88,447 37%
Mitt Romney 75,202 31%
Mike Huckabee 26,760 11%
Rudy Giuliani 20,387 9%
Ron Paul 18,276 8%
Total Write-ins 4,908 2%
Fred Thompson 2,884 1%
Duncan Hunter 1,220 1%
Alan Keyes 220 0%
Stephen Marchuk 120 0%
Jack Shepard 75 0%
Tom Tancredo 68 0%
Hugh Cort 43 0%
Albert Howard 43 0%
Cornelius O'Connor 41 0%
Vermin Supreme 41 0%
John Cox 40 0%
Vern Wuensche 39 0%
Daniel Gilbert 33 0%
James Mitchell 30 0%
Mark Klein 19 0%
Neal Fendig 13 0%
from:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=84047
anyone that tries to discredit this story because of prisonplanet or alex jones is sorely misinformed, this story did NOT start with them, they're only reporting it. voter fraud happens and is real! it IS a conspiracy, but it is NOT a theory! |
|
|
