| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Fleabass76 |
Posted - 05/27/2003 : 10:47:44 PM
A friend of mine just hipped me to this document which has some pretty interesting stuff. It is very long, but it's worth a good read. Normally I wouldn't take this sort of thing to heart, but there's just so much evidence that it's hard to believe that it's coincidence...scary.
CONTENTS AND SUMMARY - Priority questions
Why are both Bush and Cheney urging the Senate to "limit" 9-11 inquiries?
***********************************************************************
Why did Bush force the FBI to "back off" investigations into Bin Laden &
Mid-East Terrorists prior to 9-11?
***********************************************************************
Why did Deputy Director of the FBI, O'Neill resign the FBI just prior to
9-11, over outrage of the Bush Admin, hampering their terrorist
investigations, because of "oil interests" according to O'Neill?
***********************************************************************
Why did Bush's staff not follow normal procedures in the case of a
national emergency on 9-11?
**********************************************************************
Why, in the middle of the war on terrorism, did Bush seal presidential
records for the 1st time in U.S. history?
***********************************************************************
Why are foreign intelligence officials suggesting Bush and the CIA may
have been behind 9-11?
***********************************************************************
Why is former 20-year U.S. Foreign Service employee, Michael Springman
suggesting that Bush and the CIA were behind 9-11?
***********************************************************************
Why did the Bush Admin officials threaten the Taliban with a "carpet of
bombs," just BEFORE 9-11, when a major pipeline deal with Enron went
sour?
***********************************************************************
Why were warnings of coming attacks from foreign intelligence officials
ignored?
***********************************************************************
Why were FAA and DOD standard intercept regulations ALL violated on
9-11?
***********************************************************************
Why did the CIA station chief in meet in Dubai with Bin Laden 7 WEEKS
prior to 9-11, and not arrest him?
***********************************************************************
Why were "insider stock profits" made off 9-11, ORGASMED over by U.S.
media, until they realized that they didn't lead to Bin Laden, but to
AB Brown Trust (once chaired by the #3 man at the CIA, and known as an
institution with ties to covert operations?
***********************************************************************
Why was the anthrax, send to the TOP DEMOCRAT, and to U.S. media (but
not Bush or his pals), discovered to be an EXACT DNA match, not for
Iranian or Russian Anthrax, but for U.S. Military anthrax?
***********************************************************************
Is it Outrageous to Consider that Elements of a Nations' Government
Could Commit Terror on It's Own People for Political Reasons?
***********************************************************************
"On the surface, selling arms to a country that sponsors terrorism, of
course, clearly, you'd have to argue it's wrong, but it's the exception
sometimes that proves the rule."
- George Bush on Good Morning America. 01/28/87
DETAILS AND SOURCES OF EVIDENCE
1. Why are both Bush and Cheney urging the Senate to "limit" 9-11
inquiries?
There are now 12 Congressional Committees planning to investigate 9-11,
and how it was allowed to occur. Bush & Cheney have taken the
unprecedented step of urging the Senate to "limit" inquiries into 9-11.
Don't go there: Bush Asks Daschle to Limit Sept. 11 Probes.
Date: Wednesday, January 30 @ 10:09:24 EST
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush personally asked Senate Majority
Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into
the events of September 11, congressional and White House sources told CNN.
The request was made at a private meeting with congressional leaders
Tuesday morning. Sources said Bush initiated the conversation. He asked
that only the House and Senate intelligence committees look into the
potential breakdowns among federal agencies that could have allowed the
terrorist attacks to occur, rather than a broader inquiry that some
lawmakers have proposed, the sources said.
Tuesday's discussion followed a rare call to Daschle from Vice President
Dick Cheney last Friday to make the same request.
"The vice president expressed the concern that a review of what happened
on September 11 would take resources and personnel away from the effort
in the war on terrorism," Daschle told reporters.
But, Daschle said, he has not agreed to limit the investigation. "I
acknowledged that concern, and it is for that reason that the
Intelligence Committee is going to begin this effort, trying to limit
the scope and the overall review of what happened," said Daschle,
D-South Dakota. "But clearly, I think the American people are entitled
to know what happened and why," he said.
Fire Engineering Magazine assails the incredible speed that the evidence
in the WTC collapse is being destroyed. Never in the history of fire
investigations has evidence been destroyed this fast before exhaustive
investigations can be completed. ["We must try to find out why the twin
towers fell" By James Quintiere,Baltimore Sun 1/3/01
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.towers03jan03.story
-WTC "INVESTIGATION"?: A CALL TO ACTION from Fire Engineering Magazine]
2. Why did Bush force the FBI to "back off" investigations into Bin
Laden & Mid-East Terrorists prior to 9-11?
- The Bush Administration forced the FBI to back off of the Bin Laden
investigation months before 9-11. [BBC transcript: BUSH - BIN LADEN
HIDDEN AGENDA]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/events/newsnight/newsid_1645000/1645527.stm
3. Why did Deputy Director of the FBI, O’Neill resign the FBI just prior
to 9-11, over outrage of the Bush Admin, hampering their terrorist
investigations, because of "oil interests" according to O'Neill?
Reportedly the Bush Administration forced the FBI to "back off" on
their investigations of terrorism in the Middle East. FBI Deputy
Director O'Neill (killed in WTC on 9-11) reportedly resigned not long
before 9-11 over this investigative obstruction, claiming that the main
obstruction was the interests of American Oil Companies. (Source:
Recently released French Book, "Bin Laden, La Verite Interdite" (Bin
Laden, the Forbidden Truth)
4. Why did Bush's staff not follow normal procedures in the case of a
national emergency on 9-11?
The UK Guardian Newspaper has questioned how Bush, who claimed in two
public appearances to have seen the first plane hit the first tower on
television the morning of 9-11, before the 2nd tower got hit? The
significance of this is that no one in the world saw that first tower
get hit, at that time, on television. They also question why Bush
continued to sit with elementary school students after the 2nd tower was
hit and he was informed, "America is under attack."
Standard procedure for such a situation is to whisk the President away,
if not for his safety, for the safety of the students. Unless he knew
something more than we did that morning. The Independent asks, "what
television station was HE watching?"
Summary conclusions from 2 part fully sourced investigative article at
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm
1) Before President Bush left his hotel, the Secret Service knew a
hijacked plane had ploughed into the World Trade Center, a building that
symbolized US power.
2) The President is the most obvious individual target for a terrorist
attack.
3) The President was scheduled to visit the Booker School that morning.
The visit was of no importance - that is, he could easily cancel it. His
schedule was publicly known, down to the minute he would give a
televised talk on education - 9:30.
4) The Secret Service has long been aware that one of the trickiest
security dangers is posed by a suicide attack from a hijacked commercial
airplane from a nearby airport. On a day when planes were being hijacked
from different airports and crashing into buildings, a top security
precaution would be to keep the President away from a publicly announced
appointment at a building near an airport.
The Booker School is fewer than 5 miles from the Sarasota-Bradenton
International Airport.
So WHY did GW Bush continue with his highly exposed appointment?
5. Why, in the middle of the war on terrorism, did Bush seal
presidential records for the 1st time in U.S. history?
Bush Administration declares they will "seal the records of presidents
beginning with Father Bush/Reagans (an act never before done in US
presidential history)."
"It is not a stretch to wonder if this White House is up to something
that it doesn't want known 12 years from now or any time thereafter. [A
direct quote from the piece carried by Scripps Howard News Service,
11/5/2001. Re: Bush's sealing of presidential records for the first
time in U.S. history]
6. Why are foreign intelligence officials suggesting Bush and the CIA
may have been behind 9-11?
FORMER GERMAN CABINET MINISTER ATTACKS OFFICIAL BRAINWASHING ON
SEPTEMBER 11 ISSUE [Source: Tagesspiegel, Berlin, Jan. 13]
PARTIAL TRANSLATION
In a full-page interview with the Sunday edition (Jan. 13) of the Berlin
Tagesspiegel daily, former German Minister of Technology, Andreas von
Buelow, said he does not buy any of the official theories that have been
presented to date, on the events of September 11.
Q: You seem so angry, really upset.
Von Buelow: I can explain what's bothering me: I see that after the
horrifying attacks of Sept. 11, all political public opinion is being
forced into a direction that I consider wrong.
Q: What do you mean by that?
Von Buelow: I wonder why many questions are not asked. Normally, with
such a terrible thing, various leads and tracks appear that are then
commented on, by the investigators, the media, the government: Is there
something here or not?
Are the explanations plausible? This time, this is not the case at all.
It already began just hours after the attacks in New York and Washington
and--
Q: In those hours, there was horror, and grief.
Von Buelow: Right, but actually it was astounding: There are 26
intelligence services in the U.S.A. with a budget of $30 billion--
Q: ...more than the German defense budget...
Von Buelow: --which were not able to prevent the attacks. In fact, they
didn't even have an inkling they would happen. For 60 decisive minutes,
the military and intelligence agencies let the fighter planes stay on
the ground, 48 hours later, however, the FBI presented a list of suicide
attackers. Within ten days, it emerged that seven of them were still
alive.
Q: What, please?
Von Buelow: Yes, yes. And why did the FBI chief take no position
regarding contradictions? Where the list came from, why it was false?
If I were the chief investigator (state attorney) in such a case, I
would regularly go to the public, and give information on which lead are
valid and which not.
Q: That sounds like--
Von Buelow: --like assailants who, in their preparations, leave tracks
behind them like a herd of stampeding elephants? They made payments with
credit cards with their own names; they reported to their flight
instructors with their own names. They left behind rented cars with
flight manuals in Arabic for jumbo jets. They took with them, on their
suicide trip, wills and farewell letters, which fall into the hands of
the FBI, because they were stored in the wrong place and wrongly
addressed. Clues were left like behind like in a child's game of
hide-and-seek, which were to be followed!
There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: According to
this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots'
hands, from outside.
The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could
rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting
[automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abused in
this case. That's a theory....
Q: Which sounds really adventurous, and was never considered.
Von Buelow: You see! I do not accept this theory, but I find it worth
considering. And what about the obscure stock transactions? In the week
prior to the attacks, the amount of transactions in stocks in American
Airlines, United Airlines, and insurance companies, increased 1,200%. It
was for a value of $15 billion. Some people must have known something.
Who?
Q: Why don't you speculate on who it might have been.
Von Buelow: With the help of the horrifying attacks, the Western mass
democracies were subjected to brainwashing. The enemy image of
anti-communism doesn't work any more; it is to be replaced by peoples of
Islamic belief. They are accused of having given birth to suicidal
terrorism.
Q: Brainwashing? That's a tough term.
Von Buelow: Yes? But the idea of the enemy image doesn't come from me.
It comes from Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington, two
policy-makers of American intelligence and foreign policy. Already in
the middle of the 1990s, Huntingon believed, people in Europe and the
U.S. needed someone they could hate—this would strengthen their
identification with their own society. And Brzezinski, the mad dog, as
adviser to President Jimmy Carter, campaigned for the exclusive right of
the U.S. to seize all the raw materials of the world, especially oil and
gas.
Q: You mean, the events of Sept. 11--
Von Buelow: --fit perfectly in the concept of the armaments industry,
the intelligence agencies, the whole military-industrial-academic
complex. This is in fact conspicuous. The huge raw materials reserves of
the former Soviet Union are now at their disposal, also the pipeline
routes and--
Q: Erich Follach described that at length in Spiegel: ``It's a matter of
military bases, drugs, oil and gas reserves.''
Von Buelow: I can state: the planning of the attacks was technically and
organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes
within a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their
targets, with complicated flight maneuvers! This is unthinkable, without
years-long support from secret apparatuses of the state and industry.
Q: You are a conspiracy theorist!
Von Buelow: Yeah, yeah. That's the ridicule heaped [on those raising
these questions] by those who would prefer to follow the official,
politically correct line. Even investigative journalists are fed
propaganda and disinformation. Anyone who doubts that doesn't have all
his marbles! That is your accusation.
Q: Your career actually speaks against the idea that you are not in your
right mind. You were already in the 1970s, state secretary in the
Defense Ministry; in 1993 you were the SPD [Social Democratic Party]
speaker in the Schalk-Golodkowski investigation committee--
Von Buelow: And it all began there! Until that time, I did not have any
great knowledge of the work of intelligence agencies. And now we had to
take note of a great discrepancy: We shed light on the dealings of the
Stasi and other East bloc intelligence agencies in the field of economic
criminality, but as soon as we wanted to know something about the
activities of the BND [German intelligence agency] or the CIA, it was
mercilessly blocked. No information, no cooperation, nothing! That's
when I was first taken aback.
7. Why is former 20-year U.S. Foreign Service employee Michael
Springman suggesting that Bush and the CIA were behind 9-11?
An interview with Michael Springman exposes the CIA's links with the
terrorist attacks on September 11
Straight Goods reader Ken MacAllister of Vancouver, BC writes:
Michael Springmann worked for the US government for 20 years with
the Foreign Service and consulate. He just went public with the story of
his involvement in a large scale CIA operation that brought hundreds of
people from the middle east to the US, issued them passports and trained
them to be terrorists. Springmann says that the CIA is working closely
with Bin Laden and his operatives in Jeddah and has been since 1987. The
most haunting implication from this interview is that all of the
terrorist acts of late were planned and paid for by the CIA with US
taxpayers' money so that the US could legitimately bomb the hell out of
Afghanistan.
The interview can be heard on the web, at
http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewNote.cfm?REF=1267
8. Why did the Bush Administration officials threaten the Taliban with
a "carpet of bombs," just BEFORE 9-11, when a major pipeline deal with
Enron went sour?
THE OIL LINK:
US Oil interests were well represented within the negotiating team,
that apparently was the source of the threat to "bury Afghanistan in a
carpet of bombs" unless they played ball in creating a major oil
pipeline through Afghanistan. This threat was reportedly made several
months before 9-11. (Bush's family has a strong oil background. So do
some of his top aides.)
ENRON DID THE FEASABILITY STUDY FOR THIS MULTIBILLION DOLLAR PROJECT:
The reason goes back to GW’s dealings with Enron and the Taliban when
he was still Texas Governor, which is why GW is desperately trying to
“hide” his Texas Governor’s records under his daddy’s Presidential
Library entombment. Legal battles are now forming to keep them public.
Apparently, GW also lobbied Argentina on Enron’s behalf to deregulate
Argentine energy in Enron’s favor, which many in Argentina believe may
be at the very heart of Argentina’s economic collapse. Now GW is using
U.S. military as a security guard for oil pipelines in Columbia. Our
Middle East and Latin American policy has been driven by U.S. oil
interests at the constant and tireless behest of then Gov. George Bush.
U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was until the end of last year president
of Halliburton, a company that provides services for the oil industry.
National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice was between 1991 and 2000
manager for Chevron. Ministers of Commerce and Energy, Donald Evans and
Stanley Abraham worked for Tom Brown, another oil giant.
ON BUSH'S LONG TERM OIL PLANS FOR AFGHANISTAN (BEFORE 9-11):
George W. inexplicably tries to send his Texas Governor's papers to his
father's presidential library, where they would apparently be exempt
from Texas' tough freedom of information laws. While the papers sit in
legal limbo, not yet safely entombed, a Texas FOI request frees Bush's
entire correspondence with Enron - and out pops a letter from Kenny Boy
requesting Gov. Bush to please meet with the President of ...
Uzbekistan. "We are negotiating a $2 Billion venture with
Neftegas of Uzbekistan and Gazprom of Russia to develop Uzbekistan's
natural gas and transport it to markets in Europe and Kazakhstan and
Turkey. This project can bring significant economic opportunities to
Texas...."
A summary of events concerning oil, Afghanistan and the US Government,
from http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/02_11_02_lucy.html:
1991-1997 - Major U.S. oil companies including Exxon-Mobil, Texaco,
Unocal, BP Amoco and Shell directly invest almost $3 billion in cash
bribing heads of state in Kazakhstan to secure equity rights in the huge
oil reserves in these regions. The oil companies further commit to
future direct investments in Kazakhstan of $35 billion. Not being
willing to pay exorbitant prices to Russia to use Russian pipelines the
major oil companies have no way to recoup their investments. [Sources
Testimony before the House International Relations Committee 2/12/98]
December 4, 1997 – Representatives of the Taliban are invited guests to
the Texas headquarters of Unocal to negotiate their support for the
pipeline. Subsequent reports will indicate that the negotiations failed,
allegedly because the Taliban wanted too much money. [Source: The BBC,
Dec. 4, 1997]
February 12, 1998 - Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca – later to
become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan – testifies before the House
that until a single, unified, friendly government is in place in
Afghanistan the trans-Afghani pipeline needed to monetize the oil will
not be built. [Source: Testimony before the House International
Relations Committee.]
1998 and 2000 - Former President George H.W. Bush travels to Saudi
Arabia on behalf of the privately owned Carlyle Group, the 11th largest
defense contractor in the U.S. While there he meets privately with the
Saudi royal family and the bin Laden family. [Source: Wall Street
Journal, Sept. 27, 2001. See also FTW, Vol. IV, No 7 - "The Best Enemies
Money Can Buy" - http://www.copvcia.com/members/carlyle.html. ]
July, 2001 - Three American officials, Tom Simmons (former U.S.
Ambassador to Pakistan), Karl Inderfurth (former Assistant Secretary of
State for South Asian affairs) and Lee Coldren (former State Department
expert on South Asia), meet with Pakistani and Russian intelligence
officers in Berlin and tell them that the U.S. is planning military
strikes against Afghanistan in October. A French book released in
November, "Bin Laden - La Verite Interdite," discloses that Taliban
representatives often sat in on the meetings. British papers confirm
that the Pakistani ISI relayed the threats to the Taliban. [Source: The
Guardian, September 22, 2001; the BBC, September 18, 2001; the Inter
Press Service, Nov 16, 2001]
October 10, 2001 - The Pakistani newspaper The Frontier Post reports
that U.S. Ambassador Wendy Chamberlain has paid a call on the Pakistani
oil minister. A previously abandoned Unocal pipeline from Turkmenistan,
across Afghanistan, to the Pakistani coast, for the purpose of selling
oil and gas to China, is now back on the table "in view of recent
geopolitical developments."
9. Why were warnings of coming attacks from US and foreign intelligence
officials seemingly ignored?
August 11 or 12 - US Navy Lt. Delmart "Mike" Vreeland, jailed in Toronto
on U.S. fraud charges and claiming to be an officer in U.S. Naval
intelligence, writes details of the pending WTC attacks and seals them
in an envelope which he gives to Canadian authorities. (His warning in a
sealed envelope opened on 9/14, is now held by Ottawa Govt.) [Source:
The Toronto Star, Oct. 23, 2001; Toronto Superior Court Records]
September 14, 2001 - Canadian jailers open the sealed envelope from Mike
Vreeland in Toronto and see that is describes attacks against the WTC
and Pentagon. The U.S. Navy subsequently states that Vreeland was
discharged as a seaman in 1986 for unsatisfactory performance and has
never worked in intelligence. [Source: The Toronto Star, Oct. 23, 2001;
Toronto Superior Court records]
June 2001 - German intelligence, the BND, warns the CIA and Israel that
Middle Eastern terrorists are “planning to hijack commercial aircraft to
use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and Israeli
culture.” [Source: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, September 14, 2001.]
Summer 2001 - An Iranian man phones U.S. law enforcement to warn of an
imminent attack on the World Trade Center in the week of September 9th.
German police confirm the calls but state that the U.S. Secret Service
would not reveal any further information. [Source: German news agency
“online.de”, September 14, 2001, translation retrieved from online.ie in
Ireland.] http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/02_11_02_lucy.html
August 2001 - The FBI arrests an Islamic militant linked to bin Laden in
Boston. French intelligence sources confirm that the man is a key member
of bin Laden’s network and the FBI learns that he has been taking flying
lessons. At the time of his arrest the man is in possession of technical
information on Boeing aircraft and flight manuals. [Source: Reuters,
September 13.]
August 2001 - Russian President Vladimir Putin orders Russian
intelligence to warn the U.S. government “in the strongest possible
terms” of imminent attacks on airports and government buildings.
[Source: MS-NBC interview with Putin, September 15.]
September 11, 2001 - Employees of Odigo, Inc. in Israel, one of the
world’s largest instant messaging companies, with offices in New York,
receive threat warnings of an imminent attack on the WTC less than two
hours before the first plane hits the WTC. Law enforcement authorities
have gone silent about any investigation of this. [Source: CNN's Daniel
Sieberg, 9/28/01; Newsbytes, Brian McWilliams, 9/27/01; Ha'aretz,
9/26/01.]
10. Why were FAA and DOD standard intercept regulations ALL violated on
9-11?
"I was one of the first tenants in the World Trade Center (WTC) back
in 1979. Back then -- over 20 years ago -- it was known to all the
tenants of the WTC that the WTC was a "no fly" zone.
If you came within 12 miles of the WTC, flying outside of a
pattern where you were supposed to be, you were warned to back off. If
you came within five miles, they would threaten to shoot you down. If
you came within three miles, they could shoot you down. ... I had a
friend who was flying a small plane who got warned away and they almost
blew him out of the sky 20 years ago because he was showing somebody a
close view of the towers. I can see the first tower getting hit by
surprise, but 15 minutes later the second tower also gets hit? I don't
buy it." Walter Burien, Radio Free America, Nov 11, 2001
September 11, 2001 - For 35 minutes, from 8:15 AM until 9:05 AM, with it
widely known within the FAA and the military that four planes have been
simultaneously hijacked and taken off course, no one notifies the
President of the United States. It is not until 9:30 that any Air Force
planes are scrambled to intercept, but by then it is too late. This
means that the National Command Authority waited for 75 minutes before
scrambling aircraft, even though it was known that four simultaneous
hijackings had occurred – an event that has never happened in history.
[Sources: CNN, ABC, MS-NBC, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times.]
It is a FACT that DOZENS of Air Force and Air National Guard bases are
located within TEN to THIRTY minutes intercept time of BOTH 9/11 target
locations.
It is a FACT that most of these installations have at the ready fighter
jets such as F-16s to be scrambled on a MOMENT'S NOTICE, for
intercepting troubled or problem aircraft.
It is a FACT that air defense units DID receive alerts from Air
Traffic Controllers and non-corrupt FAA officials on a number of
aircraft across the East Coast that had broken communications and
deviated radically from established flight paths on the morning of
September 11.
It is a FACT that standard intercept procedures for dealing with these
kinds of situations ARE TOTALLY ESTABLISHED, IN FORCE and ON-
LINE in these United States 365 days a year, 7 days a week, 24 hours a
day.
Background - Regulations and Procedures:
- Regarding rules governing IFR requirements, see FAA Order 7400.2E
'Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters,' Effective Date:
December 7, 2000 (Includes Change 1, effective July 7, 2001), Chapter
14-1-2.Full text posted at:
http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIR/air1401.html#14-1-2FAA
- Guide to Basic Flight Information and Air Traffic Control (ATC)
Procedures,' (Includes Change 3 Effective: July 12, 2001) Chapter 5-6-4
"Interception Signals" Full text posted at:
http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/Chap5/aim0506.html#5-6-4
- FAA Order 7110.65M 'Air Traffic Control' (Includes Change 3
Effective: July 12, 2001), Chapter 10-2-5 "Emergency Situations"
Full text posted at:
http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/ATC/Chp10/atc1002.html#10-2-5
- FAA Order 7110.65M 'Air Traffic Control' (Includes Change 3
Effective: July 12, 2001), Chapter 10-1-1 "Emergency Determinations"
Full text posted at:
http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/ATC/Chp10/atc1001.html#10-1-1
- FAA Order 7610.4J 'Special Military Operations' (Effective Date:
November 3, 1998; Includes: Change 1, effective July 3, 2000;
Change 2, effective July 12, 2001), Chapter 4, Section 5, "Air Defense
Liaison Officers (ADLO's)". Full text posted at:
http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/MIL/Ch4/mil0405.html#Section%205
- FAA Order 7610.4J 'Special Military Operations' (Effective Date:
November 3, 1998; Includes: Change 1, effective July 3, 2000;
Change 2, effective July 12, 2001), Chapter 7, Section 1-2, "Escort of
Hijacked Aircraft: Requests for Service". Full text posted at:
http://faa.gov/ATpubs/MIL/Ch7/mil0701.html#7-1-2
- Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3610.01A,' 1
June 2001, "Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) and Destruction of Derelict
Airborne Objects," 4. Policy (page 1. PDF available at:
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/cjcsd/cjcsi/3610_01a.pdf
For a clear and detailed description of flight plans, fixes, and
Air Traffic Control, see: 'Direct-To Requirements' by Gregory Dennis and
Emina Torlak at: http://sdg.lcs.mit.edu/atc/D2Requirements.htm
Absolutely NO executive-level input of ANY KIND is required for standard
intercepts to be scrambled.
11. Why did the CIA station chief in meet in Dubai with Bin Laden 7
WEEKS prior to 9-11, and not arrest him?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html·
(German Trans.) http://www.orf.at/orfon/011031-44569/index.html
(US Wash Times Artcl: www.washtimes.com Report: bin Laden treated at US
hospital Elizabeth Bryant UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL Published
10/31/2001)
On a related note : In the summer of 2001 Pakistani ISI Chief General
Ahmad (see above) orders an aide to wire transfer $100,000 to Mohammed
Atta, who was according to the FBI, the lead terrorist in the suicide
hijackings. Ahmad recently resigned after the transfer was disclosed in
India and confirmed by the FBI. [Source: The Times of India, October 11,
2001.]
12. Why were "insider stock profits" made off 9-11, ORGASMED over by
U.S. media, "until" they realized that they didn't lead to Bin Laden,
but to AB Brown Trust (until recently chaired by the #3 man at the CIA,
and known as an institution with ties to covert operations?
- Someone with considerable financial resources, and foreknowledge of
the terrorist event, put stock options "against" the airlines that were
to explode that week of 9-11.
- INSIDER TRADING PROFITS from 9-11 were reported by the US media when
they thought it was Arab terrorists . . . but then the story
mysteriously died. Then the UK Independent revealed that it leads to a
firm chaired by the 3rd highest man in the CIA (and stranger still is
that $2.5 million of the "winnings" are still unclaimed. (For the entire
story, see http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RUP110A.html.)
Info confirmed by Independent Newspaper in UK:
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402]
September 6-7, 2001 - 4,744 put options (a speculation that the stock
will go down) are purchased on United Air Lines stock as opposed to only
396 call options (speculation that the stock will go up). This is a
dramatic and abnormal increase in sales of put options. Many of the UAL
puts are purchased through Deutschebank/AB Brown, a firm managed until
1998 by the current Executive Director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy"
Krongard. [Source: The Herzliyya International Policy Institute for
Counterterrorism, http://www.ict.org.il/, September 21; The New York
Times; The Wall Street Journal.]
September 10, 2001 - 4,516 put options are purchased on American
Airlines as compared to 748 call options. [Source: ICT - above]
September 6-11, 2001 - No other airlines show any similar trading
patterns to those experienced by UAL and American. The put option
purchases on both airlines were 600% above normal. This at a time when
Reuters (September 10) issues a business report stating, "Airline stocks
may be poised to take off."
September 6-10, 2001 - Highly abnormal levels of put options are
purchased in Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AXA Re(insurance) which owns
25% of American Airlines, and Munich Re. All of these companies are
directly impacted by the September 11 attacks. [Source: ICT, above; FTW,
Vol. IV, No.7, October 18, 2001,
[http://www.copvcia.com/members/oct152001.html]
Did the CIA have foreknowledge of the attack, who tried to profit
with put options on American, United, Merrill Lynch... stock just before the
attack?
* Mystery of terror `insider dealers', by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402
* Suppresed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly Into The
CIA's Highest Ranks -- CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard Managed Firm
That Handled `Put' Options on UAL, by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001
http://www.copvcia.com/stories/oct_2001/krongard.html
* Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11, by Tom Flocco - Edited
by Michael C. Ruppert, 6 Dec 2001
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FLO112B.html
http://globalreaearch.ca/articles/RUP110A.html
13. Why was the anthrax, send to the TOP DEMOCRAT, and to U.S. media
(but not Bush or his pals), discovered to be an EXACT DNA match, not for
Iranian or Russian Anthrax, but for U.S. Military anthrax?
Anthrax sent to top Democrat Daschle and to the U.S. media (NBC & The
National Inquirer) had the effect of "uniting the nation behind the Bush
Administration's war effort," and literally shutting down Congress in
many ways.
Oddities exist when the anthrax issue is looked at closely:
- New Science Journal says Anthrax sent to Daschle is NOT Russian or
Iraqi, but likely US military strain.
- San Francisco Chronicle reports, the anthrax strain produced in US
University is destroyed on ok of FBI (they had studied this for years,
some at university question the timing of the destruction of those
anthrax spores . . . right now of all times (?))
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2001/11/09/MN153227.DTL
Terror Anthrax Linked to Type Made by U.S.
The powder used in the anthrax attacks is virtually indistinguishable
from that produced by the United States military, according to federal
scientists.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/03/national/03POWD.html?todaysheadlines
14. Is it Outrageous to Consider that Elements of a Nation's Government
Could Commit Terror on It's Own People for Political Reasons?
Frighteningly, there are precedents:-
- ABC News.com's May/2001 story resurfaces about how the US Joint Chiefs
of Staff have in the past ACTUALLY DESIGNED a plan to committ domestic
terror on Americans to whip them into a war hysteria, to support war
efforts by the govt.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
[The National Security Archive has a PDF version of the Operation
Northwoods plan, which author James Bamford says "may be the most
corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government." It can be found at
the following URL:]
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
Not at war. ----- The Legacy. "On the surface, selling arms to a country
that sponsors terrorism, of course, clearly, you'd have to argue it's wrong,
but it's the exception sometimes that proves the rule." - George Bush on
Good Morning America. 01/28/87
"You fucking son of a bitch, I saw what you wrote. We're not going to forget
this." - George W. Bush shouted at writer & editor Al Hunt & his 6 yr. old
son in a restaurant - 1988.... |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Fleabass76 |
Posted - 05/29/2003 : 03:18:03 AM
It's not really about belief, it's about opening up to new ideas and new information. Something is definitely up though, whether clinton or bush or ronald mcdonald had anything to do with anything, I don't know. But something is fucking up and it smells. |
| Arthen |
Posted - 05/29/2003 : 02:49:45 AM
Yeah, I tend to agree with you Teri. I really didn't like Clinton, and I don't believe he could've been involved in something like this.
Give me evidence of conversations or something to prove it behind a shadow of a doubt, and I'll believe it. |
| tericee |
Posted - 05/28/2003 : 6:47:05 PM
Nope. I don't believe it. I didn't like Clinton, but I could never think he had it in him to support an attack like that either. |
| victorwootenfan |
Posted - 05/28/2003 : 11:36:32 AM
with all our economic ties to the middle east, and the plunging economy, none of this would surprise me. We haven't had all this support for America in a long time, so it does seem like it may have been pre-meditated... |
| SurferX |
Posted - 05/28/2003 : 10:45:51 AM
Considering bin Laden is one of GW's best friends, that wouldn't surprise me... |
| Saint Jude |
Posted - 05/28/2003 : 01:38:46 AM
did the us give out planes to the bin laden family after the attacks, so they could get out of the u.s. safe.... i remember reading something along those lines at one point. |
| Fleabass76 |
Posted - 05/28/2003 : 12:35:00 AM
You have a link Arthen? And did you read this? Because Reno's call to cancel the hit is just one incident, the above is a series of actions and events which is just too much to be coincidence. |
| Arthen |
Posted - 05/28/2003 : 12:33:10 AM
One thing before all of this that I'd like to know, is why did Janet Reno stop a plan to take out Bin Laden back in the mid nineties? |
| Saint Jude |
Posted - 05/28/2003 : 12:03:13 AM
wow, thats pretty intense and disturbing.
"9. Why were warnings of coming attacks from US and foreign intelligence officials seemingly ignored? "
That whole topic is very disturbing, as is
"10. Why were FAA and DOD standard intercept regulations ALL violated on 9-11? "
Even if the government wasnt behind the attacks, they sure as hell didnt seem to try to stop them. very disturbing.
|
|
|
